🤝Dear partners, we present to your attention a report «Media Coverage of Judicial Issues: Perspectives of the Judicial and Media Communities».📗Findings of a Survey on the Communication and Dialogue Needs of Representatives of the Media and the Judiciary / V. Rybak, O. Bondarenko — Kyiv: Human Rights Vector NGO, 2025.✍🏻Literary editing: Lesia KarpenkoTranslation: JUST IN TIME, Ltd. Agency of foreign languages.🖨Translators: Kobziak Nataliia, Tipper Alisiia, editor: Diachuk Olesia.💬 «The report shows the communication needs of the judiciary and the journalistic community in covering judicial issues, the difficulties and positive examples that can inspire further work. Our organization continues to help, within its capabilities, to establish a dialogue between the judiciary and society», - Valeriia Rybak, director of the Human Rights Vector NGO.🔰Main conclusions of report:1️⃣.Interaction between the judiciary and the media remains unevenand is often shaped by individual actors rather than institutionalizedprocedures.2️⃣.Both professional groups identify resource constraints as a key challenge.3️⃣.Limited legal literacy among media professionals emerges as a significant challenge, contributing to tension and mutual misunderstanding.4️⃣.There is a shared demand for standardization of communication and professional standards of engagement.5️⃣.Both groups acknowledge that progress has been made in recent years, although developments have been uneven.6️⃣.The introduction of martial law has affected communication practices.7️⃣.There is a high demand for dialogue as a continuous format of engagement.8️⃣.Both sides express a demand for training, methodological support, and the institutional strengthening of communication capacities.❇️The Human Rights Vector NGO prepared this publication as part of the project “Dialogue Between the Media and the Judiciary to Enhance Judicial Transparency” with the support of The CEELI Institute, Prague.🇬🇧EN: https://hrvector.org/en/reports/26-03-17-media-judiciary